The Board has remanded the case for further development and consideration of the veteran's claims to reopen service connection.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the need to ensure compliance with the provisions of the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA) and the Veterans Benefits Act of 2003.
- Claimed conditions
- eye injury, bilateral error of refraction
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 26, 2004
- Citation
- 0413482
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,776 · Granted: 24% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0413482.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for lumbar radiculopathy but denied it for genitourinary kidney problem blood in urine, sleep apnea (OSA), cervical radiculopathy neck, and eye injury.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for an eye injury, a prostate disorder, diabetes mellitus, and a heart disorder to obtain additional medical evidence.
- Partly granted
The appeal for COPD was denied. The claims for eye injury and non-obstructive CAD were remanded for readjudication, with service connection for non-obstructive CAD granted under the PACT Act.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of non-VA medical care provided on July 21, 2019, at Providence Holy Family Hospital is being remanded due to the need for additional evidence and reconsideration under relevant regulations.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.