The Board denied a disability rating in excess of 30 percent for the veteran's loss of vision in the left eye, as his service-connected condition is already rated at its maximum.
The deciding factor: The veteran's service-connected left eye vision was characterized by far count finger at 1/3 feet and he had 20/100 vision both near and far in the right eye (nonservice-connected). The rating criteria provided a maximum 30 percent rating under Diagnostic Code 6070.
- Claimed conditions
- vision loss in the left eye
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 30%
- Decision date
- May 27, 2004
- Citation
- 0413608
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 504 · Granted: 31% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0413608.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied compensation under 38 U.S.C. §1151 for vision loss in the left eye, finding that there was no evidence of negligence or fault on the part of VA and that the Veteran's condition was not caused by VA care.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate notice regarding how to establish service connection for aggravation of a congenital disorder.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for dizzy spells, finding that the Veteran's lay statements regarding his in-service motorcycle accident and chronic symptoms are credible. The claim for vision loss in the left eye is remanded due to the need for a VA examination.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining records from the VA Regional Office and VAMC, as well as Social Security Administration records. A new VA opinion is also needed to address whether the complications of the July 2001 cataract surgery were reasonably foreseeable.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.