The veteran's claim for an increased rating of his service-connected residuals of a gunshot wound to the right upper arm is being remanded due to incomplete notification and development under the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA).
The deciding factor: Incomplete VCAA notifications and development are required.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a gunshot wound to the right upper arm
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 3, 2004
- Citation
- 0414251
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,677 · Granted: 26% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0414251.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for a new comprehensive VA examination to assess the current severity of his service-connected residuals of a gunshot wound to the right upper arm, including any associated vascular disability. The claim will be re-adjudicated following this development.
- Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's appeal is being remanded to the RO for additional development of his claims, including obtaining medical records and photographs of his scars. The specific right forearm scar for which service connection has been granted should be described in the re-adjudication.
- Denied
The Board denied a TDIU rating, finding that the veteran's service-connected disabilities alone do not render him unemployable.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.