The Board has remanded the case to the RO for further development due to inadequate VCAA notice and other procedural issues.
The deciding factor: The decision is pending further development as required by the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA).
- Claimed conditions
- Vincent's angina, missing teeth
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 4, 2004
- Citation
- 0414517
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0414517.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board denied service connection for missing teeth and remanded the claims for temporomandibular disorder, left knee disability, and back disability due to a need for additional evidence.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a dental condition, including missing teeth, for compensation purposes due to a lack of evidence demonstrating a current disability that meets the criteria for a compensable dental disability as defined by VA regulations.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for missing teeth, bilateral tendonitis of the hands/fingers, obstructive sleep apnea, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is being remanded due to a duty to assist error. The Board requires an addendum opinion from an appropriate clinician regarding whether these disabilities are related to service or toxic exposure.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's claim for service connection for missing teeth was dismissed because his appeal did not meet the requirements of the Appeals Modernization Act (AMA).
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.