The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to procedural deficiencies and incomplete medical records.
The deciding factor: Procedural deficiencies in VCAA notice have been identified, requiring further action by the RO/AMC.
- Claimed conditions
- spondolytic changes in the cervical spine, recurrent dislocation of the right shoulder
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 16, 2004
- Citation
- 0415378
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 999 · Granted: 31% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0415378.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the issues of increased ratings and TDIU for further development and readjudication.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for increased disability evaluations and service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including VA examinations.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to new evidence and requests that VA determine whether the Veteran may be entitled to compensation for his symptoms of radiating pain and numbness in his right arm.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, which include recurrent dislocation of the right shoulder and anxiety, render her unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation. The Board finds that she meets the requirements for consideration of an extra-schedular TDIU.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.