The veteran's appeal is remanded for additional development, including obtaining medical opinions and employment history information.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the case required further development to ensure compliance with VA's duty to assist and to provide a complete record of the veteran's employability status due to his service-connected disabilities.
- Claimed conditions
- paralysis of the external popliteal nerve of the left leg, residuals of a lung injury, residuals of a right thigh injury, residual scarring and residuals of malaria
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 23, 2004
- Citation
- 0416454
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,642 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0416454.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to unclear authorization of a May 2017 bronchoscopy at Yale Medicine, and requests that records be obtained or an appropriate release completed.
- Granted
The Veteran's service connection claim for residuals of a right thigh injury is granted, while the claim for osteoarthritis of the right knee is denied.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of a right thigh injury as new and material evidence was not received to reopen the previously denied claim.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a VA examination and readjudication of the claim.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.