Service connection for tinea pedis and tinea unguium was granted with an effective date of December 2, 1994. A rating in excess of 30 percent for these conditions is denied.
The deciding factor: The RO found that the veteran's foot fungus disorder pre-existed service and was not aggravated during service, thus denying service connection. The claim was reopened due to new evidence received after December 2, 1994, which led to a grant of service connection with an effective date from that day.
- Claimed conditions
- Pes Planus, Tinea Pedis and Tinea Unguium
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- June 28, 2004
- Citation
- 0417083
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0417083.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for OSA, bilateral pes planus, hypertension, migraines headaches, and an acquired psychiatric disorder due to a lack of adequate medical evidence regarding their etiology.
- Granted
The Board granted the application to revise an April 2020 rating decision based on clear and unmistakable error (CUE), which severed service connection for obstructive sleep apnea and pes planus.
- Partly granted
The Board granted the appeal and restored service connection for Major Depressive Disorder, denied service connection for Tinnitus, and denied an earlier effective date for the increased rating of Migraine Headaches. The Board also remanded entitlement to service connection for Pes Planus.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of any bilateral pes planus that may be present. The examiner should address whether it is at least as likely as not that the Veteran's preexisting pes planus was aggravated by his military service.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.