The veteran's multiple lipomata, which were evaluated as 30 percent disabling under Diagnostic Code 7819 (as in effect prior to August 30, 2002), have not met the criteria for a higher rating during the period from October 2, 1990, to August 29, 2002.
The deciding factor: The veteran's lipomata were characterized by multiple lesions of various sizes on his forearms, legs, and back. They did not meet the criteria for a higher rating as they did not involve ulceration or extensive exfoliation or crusting, nor systemic or nervous manifestations.
- Claimed conditions
- lipomata
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 30%
- Decision date
- August 30, 2004
- Citation
- 0423991
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0423991.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for a skin disorder, including cysts and lipomata, as the evidence did not show that it was caused by or worsened by the Veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus (DM) or in-service herbicide exposure.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the Veteran's skin condition, specifically cysts and lipomata. The RO is directed to attempt to obtain private treatment records and provide a new VA medical opinion.
- Granted
The veteran's lipomata, affecting almost the entire body except for the head, neck, hands and feet, has been rated at 60 percent since August 30, 2002.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.