The veteran is seeking compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for disabilities resulting from VA hospitalization or medical/surgical treatment in May 1985, and the Board has determined that additional information is needed to properly adjudicate his claim.
The deciding factor: The decision was remanded due to the need to obtain records related to a previously filed tort claim and any investigation report or medical opinion regarding the care provided by VA.
- Claimed conditions
- scar on the base of the skull, head pain, psychotic condition, enlarged optic nerve
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 22, 2004
- Citation
- 0426240
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0426240.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current diagnoses of head pain and vertigo did not begin during service or are otherwise related to an in-service injury, thus denying his claim for service connection.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including a new examination to determine if the Veteran's current head pain disability is related to service. The TDIU claim remains pending and will also be remanded.
- Dismissed
Your claim of service connection for headaches, which you claimed was related to a service-connected eye disability, has been granted. However, the appeal is dismissed because your case no longer involves an ongoing controversy as the benefits have already been fully awarded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 due to inadequate medical opinions and new development is needed.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.