The veteran's claim for an increased evaluation for recurrent atrial fibrillation is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA examination.
The deciding factor: The decision requires further evidence and examination as per the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA).
- Claimed conditions
- recurrent atrial fibrillation
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- September 23, 2004
- Citation
- 0426356
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0426356.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's claims for service connection have been granted, with some issues being remanded for further review.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to the RO for scheduling a Travel Board hearing. The issues of entitlement to an increased rating for atrial fibrillation and TDIU are still pending.
- Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's heart disorders, including valvular heart disease (status post mitral valve replacement and aortic valve replacement), recurrent atrial fibrillation, and aortic valve stenosis, are not shown to be causally or etiologically related to any disease, injury, or incident in service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims of entitlement to service connection for ischemic heart disease, coronary artery disease, recurrent atrial fibrillation, skin cancer, and Parkinson's disease are being remanded due to the need for additional development. The claim for skin cancer has been dismissed as withdrawn by the Veteran.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.