Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The case is being remanded to the RO for further development, including obtaining an addendum from a VA orthopedic examiner and verifying all periods of service.

The deciding factor: The VA orthopedic examiner's opinion on the significance of the 1967 back injury at Fort Benning, Georgia as it may relate to the veteran's current back pathology is needed for proper adjudication.

Claimed conditions
lumbosacral strain, neuropathic pain
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
September 24, 2004
Citation
0426565

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0426565.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.