The veteran's claim for an increased rating of essential hypertension with retinopathy and ocular hypertension is being remanded. Additionally, the issues of service connection for non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy and glaucoma are inextricably intertwined with the current issue and require further examination.
The deciding factor: The veteran's claim involves multiple interconnected issues that necessitate additional examinations to determine etiologies and visual acuity.
- Claimed conditions
- essential hypertension with fundi arteriolar narrowing (retinopathy), ocular hypertension
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 24, 2004
- Citation
- 0426627
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0426627.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a back disability and an eye disability, including macular degeneration, pseudophakia, and ocular hypertension. The Board found that there was no evidence to support the Veteran's contention that his disabilities had their onset during or were related to his military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's eligibility for the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) is being remanded due to a lack of explanation in the April 2021 decision regarding whether participation in the program was in his best interest. The Board finds that the Veteran requires personal care services due to disabilities including posttraumatic stress disorder, tension headaches, and others.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection of ocular hypertension, finding that it did not begin during his military service and is not related to any in-service injury or exposure.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for conjunctivitis as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected dry eye syndrome, finding that there is an approximate balance of evidence regarding its etiology.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.