The veteran's claim for increased ratings for traumatic osteoarthritis of the lumbosacral spine is being remanded due to changes in rating criteria and additional evidence.
The deciding factor: Changes in the rating criteria for spinal disorders require review, and new evidence has been submitted since the last decision.
- Claimed conditions
- traumatic osteoarthritis of the lumbosacral spine
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 5, 2004
- Citation
- 0427532
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0427532.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for hearing loss and an increased evaluation for his lumbosacral spine disorder. The claim for hearing loss was denied as there is no evidence linking current hearing loss to military service, while the claim for a higher rating for lumbosacral spine disability was granted based on moderate incomplete paralysis of the sciatic nerve.
- Granted
The veteran's claim for a total schedular disability rating for traumatic osteoarthritis of the lumbosacral spine is granted, effective June 26, 1998. The claim of entitlement to a TDIU is dismissed as moot due to the grant of a 100 percent rating.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.