The veteran seeks service connection for mouth cancer, claimed as epidermoid squamous cell carcinoma of the uvula localized in the oropharynx. The RO denied his claim on both direct and presumptive bases due to lack of evidence linking the condition to herbicide exposure. The case is remanded for additional development including obtaining treatment records and a medical opinion.
The deciding factor: The veteran's cancer was not linked to herbicide exposure as there were no records of laryngeal cancer at the time of diagnosis or any current evidence of such.
- Claimed conditions
- epidermoid squamous cell carcinoma of the uvula localized in the oropharynx
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 24, 2004
- Citation
- 0431219
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0431219.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for epidermoid squamous cell carcinoma of the uvula localized in the oropharynx, claimed as mouth cancer, due to exposure to herbicides. The evidence did not meet the requirements for presumptive service connection based on Agent Orange exposure.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for diabetes mellitus type II with erectile dysfunction was denied as the evidence did not show that he had been diagnosed and manifested to at least a 10 percent disability rating on or prior to May 8, 2001.
- Granted
Service connection for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is granted. The appeal as to the issue of entitlement to service connection for erectile dysfunction is dismissed.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for additional development due to conflicting opinions regarding service connection for peripheral neuropathy, hypertension, and skin disabilities related to herbicide exposure.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.