The Board found no evidence of VA negligence or carelessness in the treatment provided to the veteran, and thus denied his claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence did not support the veteran's assertion that he incurred additional disability as a result of VA treatment, and the VA medical opinion indicated that the care received was appropriate given the nature of the veteran's complaints.
- Claimed conditions
- ruptured right L4-5 intervertebral disc, status post hemilaminectomy and discectomy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 15, 2004
- Citation
- 0433209
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0433209.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's lumbar L4-L5 herniated nucleus pulposus, status post hemilaminectomy and discectomy is related to service. The evidence is in equipoise as to whether this condition began during active duty.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's service-connected lumbar spine disability has been rated at 10 percent since February 8, 2008. The VA examiner found that the Veteran's functional loss due to pain more closely resembled a limitation of thoracolumbar motion with flexion restricted to less than 60 degrees but more than 30 degrees.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.