The Board denied an increased rating for residuals of a fracture of the sacrum, finding that there was no objective symptomatology to support a higher rating.
The deciding factor: The VA medical examinations and clinical records did not show any objective findings or symptoms supporting a higher disability rating.
- Claimed conditions
- fracture of the sacrum, coccygodynia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- December 20, 2004
- Citation
- 0433624
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0433624.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's depressive disorder alone rendered her unable to secure or follow substantially gainful employment, and she is entitled to a TDIU for accrued benefits purposes on and from December 19, 2015. Additionally, the Veteran meets the criteria for SMC based on statutory housebound criteria for accrued benefits purposes.
- Granted
The Veteran's depressive disorder alone rendered her unable to secure or follow substantially gainful employment, and she is granted a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) and special monthly compensation (SMC) at the housebound rate.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the claim for service connection for cause of death is remanded due to new and relevant evidence. The VA will readjudicate this issue in the first instance, taking into consideration all of the evidence of record within the applicable period.
- Denied
The Board of Veterans' Appeals has denied the Veteran's appeal as his child Dependent D turned 18 years old in March 2016, and he did not provide evidence that Dependent D was attending school. The reduction of compensation payments due to a loss of a dependent is appropriate.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.