The Board has determined that the case should be remanded for further development to determine if the veteran's service-connected facial scars contributed to his death from septicemia.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence suggests a possible causal relationship between the veteran's service-connected facial scars and his septicemia, which may have contributed to his death.
- Claimed conditions
- septicemia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 27, 2004
- Citation
- 0433972
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0433972.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied DIC and survivors' pension benefits due to the lack of evidence linking septicemia to service, and because the Appellant's income exceeded the maximum annual pension rate.
- Granted
The claim for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death has been granted due to the submission of relevant new evidence, and a VA opinion is needed regarding the etiology of his cause of death.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's cause of death was related to in-service exposure to an herbicide agent, and service connection for the cause of the Veteran’s death is granted.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for service connection related to jet fuel exposure, ulcer, bladder cancer, cervical disease, dysmenorrhea (also claimed as menstrual stress), strep throat, mononucleosis, septicemia, and miscarriages have all been denied due to the absence of a current disability. The Veteran was granted an initial 100 percent rating for her unspecified trauma and stressor related disorder with depression.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.