The Board has determined that the veteran's peripheral vascular disorder is secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner concluded that the veteran's peripheral vascular disease was more likely than not caused by his service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Claimed conditions
- Peripheral Vascular Disorder
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 5, 2005
- Citation
- 0500207
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 3,038 · Granted: 30% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0500207.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining updated VA treatment records and scheduling a VA examination to determine if the Veteran has any current psychiatric disorder related to his service-connected PVD. The matter is also referred to the Director of Compensation Services for extraschedular consideration of the Veteran's symptoms of nausea and vomiting.
- Denied
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is rated at 20 percent since January 17, 2019. The appeal for higher ratings on this issue and service connection for other conditions are denied.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for peripheral vascular disorder (PVD) as there was no evidence of a nexus between his current PVD and his military service, including exposure to herbicides. The preponderance of the evidence did not support the claim.
- Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's claimed disabilities, including peripheral vascular disorder, restless leg syndrome, and peripheral neuropathy, were not incurred in or aggravated by service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.