The Board has determined that the appellant's discharge from service was dishonorable due to willful and persistent misconduct, including AWOL, larceny, forgery, and general article offenses. As a result, his discharge constitutes a bar to VA benefits.
The deciding factor: The appellant committed serious offenses such as AWOL, larceny, forgery, and general article, which prevented the proper performance of his military duties and constituted willful and persistent misconduct resulting in an honorable discharge being revoked.
- Claimed conditions
- AWOL, larceny, forgery
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 13, 2005
- Citation
- 0501160
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,669 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0501160.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including consideration of whether the appellant experienced compelling circumstances to warrant his prolonged unauthorized absence. The appeal is now pending again with the Agency of Original Jurisdiction (AOJ).
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board of Veterans' Appeals has remanded the case for further development due to a need for a VA opinion regarding whether the appellant was insane at the time of his offense, and for consideration of new evidence submitted by the appellant.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.