The Board denied the appellant's request for an earlier effective date for DIC benefits, stating that VA was not required to notify her of potential benefits due to her call informing them of the veteran's death.
The deciding factor: VA did not have a duty to inform the appellant about potential DIC benefits as she had already called to report the veteran's death and thus had apparent entitlement to such benefits.
- Claimed conditions
- cancer of the lung, metastasis
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 18, 2005
- Citation
- 0501443
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,374 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0501443.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found that the development conducted does not comply with the July 2021 Board remand and requires an addendum VA medical opinion to address the Veteran's cervical cancer and metastasis.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases for further development and consideration due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's cancer.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claim for further action due to an inadequate examination report regarding the relationship between the Veteran's renal cell carcinoma and lung metastasis, as well as its relation to herbicide agent exposure.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue with metastasis, cause of death, and TDIU due to service-connected disabilities. The issues are related to the Veteran's in-service exposures to chemicals/toxins and bodily fluids.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.