The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection of a prostate disability and an effective date prior to June 1, 1993 for the grant of a 30 percent evaluation for absent right testicle, non-functioning left testicle, secondary to carcinoma. The veteran was not granted service connection for his prostate disability as it did not manifest during or after active duty service. For the absence of right testicle and left testicle condition, the Board found that an effective date prior to June 1, 1993 is not warranted due to lack of evidence showing a factual increase in disability within one year preceding the claim.
The deciding factor: The veteran's prostate disability was not shown to be incurred or aggravated by service and there was no evidence of a factual increase in disability within one year prior to his claim for an effective date prior to June 1, 1993.
- Claimed conditions
- prostate disability, absent right testicle, non-functioning left testicle
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 30%
- Decision date
- February 4, 2005
- Citation
- 0502788
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,500 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0502788.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the Veteran's prostate disability. The claims for esophageal cancer and Barrett's esophagus remain denied.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claim for service connection for BPH due to insufficient evidence regarding its relationship to his service-connected hypertension. The AOJ is instructed to obtain a medical opinion addressing whether BPH was caused or aggravated by his hypertension.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for residuals of a kidney removal and prostate disability due to incomplete VA medical opinions regarding exposure to toxic substances at Fort Ord. The claim for service connection for rheumatoid arthritis remains denied.
- Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for prostate disability and heart disability, finding that there is insufficient evidence to establish a link between these conditions and his active military service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.