The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been received to reopen the veteran's claim of service connection for residuals of a right eye injury, and with the resolution of reasonable doubt in favor of the veteran, service connection is granted.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the statements from the veteran and his fellow service members regarding their recollection of an eye injury sustained during service are new and material evidence. The opinion of the veteran's treating physician and the May 2003 VA eye examination report also support a finding that the veteran's current right eye impairment is more likely due to the eye injury he suffered in service.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a right eye injury
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 16, 2005
- Citation
- 0504298
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,055 · Granted: 31% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0504298.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for mild facial acne, allergic rhinitis, and depression based on new and relevant evidence. The claims for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), residuals of a right eye injury, and an acquired psychiatric disorder were denied.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for residuals of a right eye injury based on new and relevant evidence.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error, specifically regarding the adequacy of the VA medical opinion provided in connection with the Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of a right eye injury. The Veteran was treated for injuries to his right eye during service and now contends that he has experienced ongoing symptoms since then.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted the claim of service connection for bilateral tinnitus. The claims of service connection for lumbar spine condition, bilateral foot condition, and residuals of a right eye injury are remanded due to incomplete records.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.