The veteran's claim for increased ratings and an earlier effective date for service connection of a right ankle disability was denied. The RO found that the veteran did not meet the criteria for higher initial ratings from December 1, 1999 to September 10, 2001, or from September 11, 2001. The claim for an earlier effective date was also denied as there is no evidence showing service connection prior to December 1, 1999.
The deciding factor: The veteran's right ankle disability has been rated based on moderate limitation of motion since September 11, 2001 and the RO found that this rating adequately reflects his symptoms. The earlier periods were not granted higher ratings due to lack of evidence supporting more severe limitations in motion or other criteria for increased ratings.
- Claimed conditions
- Right ankle disorder
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 20%
- Decision date
- February 16, 2005
- Citation
- 0504334
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0504334.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board granted a 20 percent rating for the Veteran's left knee strain, service connection for right ear hearing loss, and service connection for a right ankle disorder. Other claims were denied or remanded.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for a compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss, service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, and service connection for right knee and right ankle disorders.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board is remanding the claims for service connection due to a regulatory duty to assist error.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remanded several claims for further development and readjudication, including service connection for OSA and hypertension, as well as increased ratings for right wrist sprain, MDD, tension headaches, and other musculoskeletal conditions.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.