The Board denied compensation under the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for a back disorder, disability associated with the genitourinary system, and neuropsychiatric disability due to carelessness, negligence, lack of skill, or involved errors in judgment or similar instances of fault on the part of VA.,The Board found no evidence of current identifiable additional back or genitourinary disability related to the VA's treatment of the veteran's colorectal cancer. The Board also found that the veteran's DJD of the lumbar spine was not a secondary expression of his cancer problem, and his genitourinary complaints were related to prostatic hypertrophy.,The Board concluded that the preponderance of the evidence did not establish that any current back, genitourinary, or neuropsychiatric disabilities are the result of carelessness, negligence, lack of skill, or involved errors in judgment or similar instances of fault on the part of VA.
The deciding factor: The Board found no evidence of a current disability related to the veteran's treatment by VA and concluded that any identified disabilities were not caused by VA's actions.
- Claimed conditions
- back disorder, genitourinary system (including impotence with testicular pain and bladder pain with spasm and dribbling on urination), neuropsychiatric disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- March 9, 2005
- Citation
- 0506758
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0506758.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional development, including obtaining SSA records and providing proper notice regarding secondary service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for a back disorder, high blood pressure, and type II diabetes mellitus due to errors in development of the claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims of entitlement to service connection for headaches, right hip disorder, left hip disorder, back disorder, and an acquired psychiatric disorder due to a failure to provide notice regarding the Veteran's right to a hearing.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's appeals for service connection for peripheral vascular disease of the bilateral lower extremities and a back disorder have been dismissed as he has withdrawn his appeal.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.