The Board denied compensation under the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for a back disorder, disability associated with the genitourinary system, and neuropsychiatric disability due to carelessness, negligence, lack of skill, or involved errors in judgment or similar instances of fault on the part of VA.,The Board found no evidence of current identifiable additional back or genitourinary disability related to the VA's treatment of the veteran's colorectal cancer. The Board also found that the veteran's DJD of the lumbar spine was not a secondary expression of his cancer problem, and his genitourinary complaints were related to prostatic hypertrophy.,The Board concluded that the preponderance of the evidence did not establish that any current back, genitourinary, or neuropsychiatric disabilities are the result of carelessness, negligence, lack of skill, or involved errors in judgment or similar instances of fault on the part of VA.
The deciding factor: The Board found no evidence of a current disability related to the veteran's treatment by VA and concluded that any identified disabilities were not caused by VA's actions.
- Claimed conditions
- back disorder, genitourinary system (including impotence with testicular pain and bladder pain with spasm and dribbling on urination), neuropsychiatric disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 9, 2005
- Citation
- 0506758
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0506758.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional development, including obtaining SSA records and providing proper notice regarding secondary service connection.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for a back disorder, high blood pressure, and type II diabetes mellitus due to errors in development of the claim.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims of entitlement to service connection for headaches, right hip disorder, left hip disorder, back disorder, and an acquired psychiatric disorder due to a failure to provide notice regarding the Veteran's right to a hearing.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeals for service connection for peripheral vascular disease of the bilateral lower extremities and a back disorder have been dismissed as he has withdrawn his appeal.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.