The VA denied the veteran's claims for increased evaluation and SMC due to his service-connected GSW to the right foot, finding that the residuals did not warrant a higher rating or anatomical loss of use.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence showed minimal residual disability from the GSW with no anatomical loss of use of the foot.
- Claimed conditions
- Osteomyelitis of the right foot, GSW to the right foot
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- March 10, 2005
- Citation
- 0507005
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0507005.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's outpatient IV antibiotic treatment for osteomyelitis from February 5, 2019 to March 20, 2019 was not authorized by VA prior to the treatment. However, as his emergency treatment in January and February 2019 was covered under 38 U.S.C. § 1728, the Veteran's outpatient IV antibiotic treatment is granted.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected PTSD alone prevented him from obtaining and maintaining substantially gainful employment, leading to a TDIU rating.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.