The Board has granted service connection for surgical scarring from the removal of a perirectal abscess and denied service connection for nerve damage of the low back, with radiating pain, as a post-operative residual for the removal of a perirectal abscess.
The deciding factor: Service connection was established based on direct evidence in the medical records documenting the surgical procedure during service.
- Claimed conditions
- surgical scarring for the removal of a perirectal abscess, nerve damage of the low back
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 14, 2005
- Citation
- 0507206
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0507206.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board has determined that the veteran's current nerve damage of the low back is not related to his service, specifically the spinal procedure and anesthesia performed in 1956. The preponderance of evidence supports this conclusion.
- Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development of his claims, including obtaining medical records and conducting examinations. The issues include compensation benefits under the 1151 statute, service connection for melioidosis and antibiotic reaction, and a rating increase for left lower extremity disability.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.