The veteran is seeking compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for a chronic left eye disability that allegedly resulted from VA medical treatment in 2000. The case has been remanded to obtain additional information and evidence, including a VA ophthalmologic examination.
The deciding factor: The veteran's claim requires further development due to incomplete notification of the VCAA requirements and need for additional medical evidence regarding his left eye disability.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic left eye disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- March 24, 2005
- Citation
- 0508845
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0508845.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection of a chronic left eye disability was dismissed due to the appellant's death.
- Denied
The Board found no evidence linking the Veteran's current chronic left eye disability and loss of vision to his service, including any in-service accident involving a practice grenade. The VA examiner concluded that the Veteran's cataracts are more likely related to age than to service.
- Denied
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a chronic left eye disability secondary to his service-connected residuals of a fracture of the right mandible and for an increased rating for his service-connected residuals of a fracture of the right mandible.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.