Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Dismissed

The Board dismissed the veteran's claim for service connection for erectile dysfunction as secondary to his service-connected varicocele due to a procedural defect in filing a timely substantive appeal. The increased rating and pension claims remain under review.

The deciding factor: The veteran did not file a timely substantive appeal regarding the issue of entitlement to service connection for erectile dysfunction on a secondary basis.

Claimed conditions
erectile dysfunction, varicocele
How they argued it
Secondary to another service-connected condition
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
April 5, 2005
Citation
0509860

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0509860.

What this means for you

A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.