The veteran does not have additional cervical spine disability, nor was there any increase in severity of the pre-existing cervical spine disability, as a result of VA treatment in 1988.
The deciding factor: VA medical records show that the veteran's cervical spine condition was due to his prior injury and subsequent degenerative changes, not related to the 1988 VA outpatient treatment.
- Claimed conditions
- additional cervical spine disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 2, 2005
- Citation
- 0514994
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0514994.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran was denied compensation under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for additional cervical spine disability and headaches / constant head pain and numbness / tingling of the right forearm, hand, and fingers as a result of VA right shoulder surgery performed on July 16, 2010.,The Veteran's additional disabilities were not caused by or aggravated by the July 16, 2010 VA right shoulder surgery. The disabilities were due to degenerative changes in the cervical spine and other factors.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 and his increased rating claim are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining VA medical records from North Chicago VAMC.
- Remanded (sent back)
The veteran is seeking compensation under the 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for additional cervical spine disability, which he contends resulted from VA medical treatment provided in June through August 2002. The case has been remanded to obtain a VA examination and opinion regarding whether there was any additional disability resulting from VA carelessness or negligence.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.