Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Denied

The veteran's claim for a compensable rating for service-connected hemorrhoids was denied due to the lack of evidence of irreducible large or thrombotic hemorrhoids with excessive redundant tissue.,Service connection for diabetes mellitus was denied as there is no evidence linking the condition to service, and it was not shown to be related to chemical exposure during service. The claim for eligibility for outpatient dental treatment based on a claimed dental disorder was also denied.,The veteran's two front teeth were broken during service but were filled after 180 days of active duty, which is considered normal at entry.

The deciding factor: The evidence did not show the presence of irreducible large or thrombotic hemorrhoids with excessive redundant tissue, as required for a compensable rating under DC 7336.,There was no medical evidence linking diabetes mellitus to service or chemical exposure during service. The claim for eligibility for outpatient dental treatment based on a claimed dental disorder was denied because the teeth were filled after more than 180 days of active duty, which is considered normal at entry.,The veteran's two front teeth were broken during service but were filled after 180 days of active duty, which is considered normal at entry.

Claimed conditions
hemorrhoids, diabetes mellitus, dental disorder
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
June 3, 2005
Citation
0515120

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0515120.

What this means for you

A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.