The veteran seeks service connection for tonsillar fossa and/or lateral oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer with metastases, including left parotoid. The RO denied this claim as the condition is not a presumptive disease associated with herbicide exposure.
The deciding factor: The VA medical examiner will determine if the veteran's condition can be considered a respiratory system cancer and whether it is related to service.
- Claimed conditions
- tonsillar fossa, lateral oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer with metastases, left parotoid
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 15, 2005
- Citation
- 0519248
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0519248.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for a new VA examination to determine if the Veteran's tonsillar fossa and/or lateral oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer with metastases, including left parotid is related to service and to provide an opinion regarding the most likely date of onset.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including a review by a medical examiner to address specific questions regarding the veteran's cancer and its relation to service.
- Granted
The Board of Veterans' Appeals has granted service connection for PTSD and Mood Disorders, both presumed conditions under the PACT Act.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for diabetes mellitus type II with erectile dysfunction was denied as the evidence did not show that he had been diagnosed and manifested to at least a 10 percent disability rating on or prior to May 8, 2001.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.