The Board denied the veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for service connection of a scar on his right upper extremity, finding that the earliest date entitlement arose was August 18, 2003. The total disability evaluation claim is pending and will be addressed in a separate decision.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the veteran did not file a claim for service connection of the scar prior to August 18, 2003, which was the date entitlement arose.
- Claimed conditions
- scar of the right upper extremity
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 19, 2005
- Citation
- 0519573
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0519573.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board denied several claims for increased ratings and granted service connection for left lower extremity radiculopathy, restored a 10 percent rating for right knee instability effective May 12, 2021, and granted an effective date of June 22, 2016, but no earlier, for the award of eligibility for Dependents' Educational Assistance (DEA) benefits under 38 U.S.C. chapter 35.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board denied the claims for initial compensable disability ratings for right upper extremity and posterior trunk scars, but remanded the claims for increased initial disability rating for left lower extremity radiculopathy and initial compensable disability rating for right lower extremity radiculopathy as well as service connection for a bilateral hand and finger condition due to inadequate VA examinations.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to incomplete records and additional consideration of the claims.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.