Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The veteran's claim for service connection for stress incontinence was denied as her condition is not shown to be related to active service.,For the period prior to September 26, 2003, the veteran's lumbar disability was rated at 10 percent. From September 26, 2003, it was rated at 20 percent under Diagnostic Code 5241. The Board found that the evidence did not support a higher rating for any time period.,The veteran's migraine headaches were rated at 30 percent and her right renal calculus at 30 percent. Both ratings are based on Diagnostic Codes 8100 and 7599-7508, respectively.,For the hallux valgus of the right foot, a separate 10 percent rating was assigned for surgery performed on February 17, 2005. The left foot's hallux valgus condition did not meet the criteria for any compensable rating.

The deciding factor: The evidence does not support a finding that stress incontinence is related to active service.,The veteran's lumbar disability was rated at 10 percent prior to September 26, 2003 and at 20 percent from that date. The Board found no basis for an increased rating under the applicable diagnostic codes.,Migraine headaches were rated based on their frequency of occurrence (one or two times per month) and duration (24 to 48 hours), which are consistent with a 30 percent evaluation under Diagnostic Code 8100. The right renal calculus was rated at 30 percent as it required dietary management but not drug therapy or invasive procedures more than twice annually.,The veteran's hallux valgus of the right foot met the criteria for a separate 10 percent rating due to surgery performed on February 17, 2005. The left foot's condition did not meet any compensable rating criteria.

Claimed conditions
stress incontinence, status post right sacroiliac fusion with traumatic arthritis without neurological involvement, migraine headaches, right renal calculus, hallux valgus of the right foot, hallux valgus of the left foot
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 9, 2005
Citation
0521482

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0521482.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.