Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Board denied the veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 as his vision loss was not due to VA treatment with medications, and there is no evidence of negligence or fault on VA's part.

The deciding factor: No competent medical evidence shows that the glaucoma medications prescribed by VA contributed to the veteran's vision loss, and all relevant opinions found it unlikely that the medication caused his condition.

Claimed conditions
vision loss
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 10, 2005
Citation
0521688

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0521688.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.