The Board has determined that the veteran's renal cell carcinoma is likely related to his asbestos exposure during service, and thus grants service connection for this condition.
The deciding factor: Medical opinions indicate a relationship between the veteran's asbestos exposure in service and his current renal cell carcinoma diagnosis.
- Claimed conditions
- Renal Cell Carcinoma
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 15, 2005
- Citation
- 0522114
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0522114.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's renal cell carcinoma, along with its associated right and left lower extremity peripheral edema, has been granted service connection effective September 1, 2015.,Effective September 1, 2015, the Veteran is also entitled to an earlier effective date for his service-connected right and left lower extremity peripheral edema.
- Granted
The Veteran's renal cell carcinoma status post right nephrectomy and partial left nephrectomy was granted a 100% rating effective February 17, 2021. The decision also addressed an earlier effective date for the grant of a 100% rating.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 30 percent for renal dysfunction, effective August 1, 2019, is denied.,The Veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 60 percent for renal dysfunction, effective November 5, 2020, is denied.
- Denied
The Board denied compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for the loss of the right kidney and an incisional hernia following a nephrectomy due to insufficient evidence showing that VA's failure to timely diagnose or treat the conditions caused additional disability.,No new evidence was presented, nor did the Veteran provide sufficient medical expertise to support his claims.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.