The RO denied service connection for cardiovascular and pulmonary disorders, finding no new and material evidence to support the claims.
The deciding factor: No new and material evidence was submitted to connect current cardiovascular and pulmonary conditions with service.
- Claimed conditions
- Cardiovascular Disorder, Pulmonary Disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 29, 2005
- Citation
- 0523753
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0523753.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient consideration of the Veteran's lay statements regarding his exposure to asbestos, particularly during service aboard a ship. A new examination and opinion are needed under the PACT Act for the Veteran's claimed pulmonary disorder.
- Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a pulmonary disorder, including as due to herbicide exposure and contaminated water Camp LeJeune exposure. The evidence does not support a finding that his lung disorders are related to his military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the claim for service connection for a pulmonary disorder is remanded due to incomplete history, inadequate examination report, and failure to consider all relevant evidence including asbestos exposure. The Veteran's claim will be reconsidered with new opinions addressing his multiple occurrences of pneumonia during active duty.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for hypertension and a cardiovascular disorder, as well as compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for the CV disorder. The appeals were based on the Veteran's contention that his current conditions are related to his military service, but the evidence did not support this claim.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.