The Board has determined that the veteran's current asbestosis is related to in-service asbestos exposure, and service connection for asbestosis is granted.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner found that the veteran's in-service exposure was light but could not rule out post-service exposure. The Board resolved this doubt in favor of the veteran, finding his current asbestosis likely related to in-service exposure.
- Claimed conditions
- pulmonary disorder (asbestosis)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 1, 2005
- Citation
- 0524100
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0524100.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for sleep apnea and pulmonary disorder (asbestosis), and denied a rating higher than 20 percent for bilateral hearing loss since September 1, 2020. The Veteran's hearing loss is currently rated at 20 percent.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development to determine the nature and etiology of his claimed conditions, including a VA examination for spine issues, lung problems, pancreatitis, and post-operative lipoma residuals. The Veteran will also be asked to provide any relevant private medical records.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.