The Board denied the veteran's claim of service connection for residuals of frostbite to the feet, finding that new and material evidence had not been submitted since a previous final denial in June 1990.
The deciding factor: The RO found that no new and material evidence had been submitted to reopen the previously denied claim of service connection for residuals of frostbite to the feet.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of frostbite to the feet
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- September 13, 2005
- Citation
- 0524900
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0524900.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have residuals of frostbite to the feet, and therefore denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board finds that the Veteran's current lower extremity and foot disorders, including gout in his feet, osteoporosis to his feet, toenail changes, and peripheral vascular disease, are not related to his service. The VA examiners opined that these conditions were less likely than not caused by or incurred during his service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran seeks service connection for residuals of frostbite to the feet, which he claims are related to exposure to cold weather during his service in Germany. The Board has determined that additional development is needed due to missing service treatment records and outstanding VA treatment records.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to new evidence submitted by the appellant and a missed VA examination. The claims for tinnitus and frostbite residuals will be reviewed again with consideration of this additional information.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.