The veteran is seeking compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for ischemic optic neuropathy of the right eye, which resulted from medication prescribed by a VA physician at the Ann Arbor VAMC. The case has been remanded to obtain additional medical records and ensure proper notification.
The deciding factor: The veteran's claim is being remanded due to incomplete evidence and inadequate notice provided in previous communications.
- Claimed conditions
- ischemic optic neuropathy of the right eye
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 31, 2005
- Citation
- 0529127
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0529127.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to lack of substantial compliance with a previous remand, requiring another VA examination and nexus opinion from an appropriate VA medical provider.
- Denied
The Board has denied service connection for a bilateral eye disability, including open angle glaucoma of both eyes and ischemic optic neuropathy of the right eye, finding that there is no evidence linking these conditions to military service.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 is granted due to inadequate VA medical treatment resulting in the rupture of his abdominal aortic aneurysm, leading to additional disabilities.
- Denied
The Board found that the ischemic optic neuropathy of the right eye was not caused by VA carelessness, negligence, or fault in prescribing medication at the Ann Arbor VAMC in early 2001.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.