The Board of Veterans' Appeals has remanded the case for further development due to incomplete records, including treatment records from VA facilities and personnel records from the Army Reserves. The veteran's claim for an increased rating for his chronic duodenal ulcer is pending.
The deciding factor: Further development of the evidence is required as requested by the Board in its prior remand directives.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic duodenal ulcer
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 18, 2005
- Citation
- 0531208
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0531208.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeals regarding his service-connected duodenal ulcer, acid reflux disorder (hiatal hernia), and hemorrhoids have been dismissed due to the death of the Veteran. The application to reopen claims for chronic fatigue syndrome has also been dismissed.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including bilateral hearing loss, varicose veins of the right leg, chronic duodenal ulcer, varicose veins of the left leg, and tinnitus, are considered in determining his employability. The case is REMANDED for a VA examination to evaluate the impact of these conditions on his ability to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation.
- Granted
The Veteran's unauthorized medical expenses incurred at a private hospital on October 7, 2008 are approved for reimbursement as the treatment was deemed necessary due to an emergency condition that would have been hazardous if delayed.
- Granted
The Veteran's chronic duodenal ulcer is currently rated at 20 percent, but the Board has determined that a higher rating of 30 percent is warranted based on his symptoms and medical findings.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.