The veteran's claim for a higher rating for his service-connected right shoulder disorder was denied as there is no evidence of marked interference with employment or frequent hospitalizations due to the disability. The Board found that the veteran had provided false testimony regarding his employment status and concluded that his service-connected right shoulder condition did not cause significant interference with his employment.
The deciding factor: The veteran's testimony about his employment was found to be false, and there is no credible evidence showing marked interference with his employment due to his service-connected right shoulder disorder.
- Claimed conditions
- complete tear of the long head of the right (major) biceps tendon, chronic impingement syndrome of the right shoulder, limitation of motion
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 40%
- Decision date
- November 30, 2005
- Citation
- 0532274
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0532274.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's eligibility for PCAFC benefits is being reviewed due to his service-connected disabilities. The Board has found the current decision inconclusive and requires a more detailed medical opinion.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims for a disability rating greater than 20 percent for right knee medial meniscus tear and repair instability, as well as for a disability rating greater than 10 percent for status post right knee medial meniscus tear and repair, arthritis and limitation of motion. The reasons are that the VA examination in September 2019 is inadequate, and there may be secondary conditions related to her service-connected disabilities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient opinions regarding whether there are additional disabilities beyond those addressed under DC 7121 and whether the Veteran's current lymphedema disorder is related to service. The case will be returned for further development.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including an examination to assess the nature and severity of disability. The Veteran should be separately rated under other DCs for symptoms associated with left lower extremity pain and swelling.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.