The Board found that the cause of the veteran's death was not related to his military service or exposure to herbicides, and denied the claim for service connection.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner determined that the non-Hodgkin's lymphoma did not contribute to the cause of death in 1991.
- Claimed conditions
- Carcinomatosis, Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (1985)
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 7, 2005
- Citation
- 0533056
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0533056.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical evaluation regarding the cause of death and the relationship between the Veteran's conditions. The Appellant is seeking service connection for the cause of her husband's death, which was attributed to carcinomatosis resulting from lung cancer and prostate cancer.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's death was caused by VA medical treatment, which contributed to his recurrence and spread of cancer. As a result, the appellant is entitled to dependency and indemnity compensation.
- Denied
The Board found that the cause of death, arteriosclerotic heart disease with carcinomatosis, was not attributable to service and thus denied service connection for the cause of death.
- Granted
The Board has reopened the appellant's claim for service connection for the cause of her husband's death due to new and material evidence. The medical opinion provided a dose estimate based on a scientific reconstruction, concluding that the veteran likely did not receive significant radiation exposure during his time in Japan. As such, the claim is granted as there was no substantial evidence linking the cancer to military service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.