The Board denied reopening the veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral ankle sprain in December 1992. New evidence submitted since then does not relate to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate this claim.,The RO denied service connection for a low back disability and nasal deformity with deviated septum in November 1961, which is considered final. The veteran did not appeal these decisions. Subsequent evidence related to the ankle sprain does not relate to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate this claim.
The deciding factor: The submitted evidence does not provide new and material information that would allow for reopening of the claims.
- Claimed conditions
- Bilateral Ankle Sprain, Low Back Disability (contusion injury), Nasal Deformity with Deviated Septum
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 8, 2005
- Citation
- 0533309
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0533309.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's asthma was granted a 10% rating from November 24, 2011 to November 13, 2013 and a 30% rating thereafter. The bilateral ankle sprain disabilities were granted a 20% rating starting March 4, 2014.,The Veteran's asthma required intermittent inhalational or oral bronchodilator therapy prior to November 13, 2013 but daily use of inhalational bronchodilator therapy and FEV-1/FVC of less than 70% from that date. The bilateral ankle sprain disabilities were manifested by moderate limitation of motion.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional development, including obtaining SSA records and providing proper notice regarding secondary service connection.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD was reopened due to the submission of new and material evidence. The appeal is granted as his PTSD is now considered service-connected.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection of a left leg disability is reopened, and the appeal is granted.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.