The Board denied the veteran's claim for disability compensation benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151, finding that his right eye aphakia was not caused by VA negligence or an unforeseen event.
The deciding factor: VA cataract surgery in 1983 resulted in irreversible vision loss due to secondary intraocular lens implant complications, but the examiner found no evidence of negligence on VA's part.
- Claimed conditions
- Right Eye Aphakia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 29, 2005
- Citation
- 0535087
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0535087.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including PTSD and eye conditions, have prevented him from securing or following substantially gainful employment since June 25, 2013.
- Denied
The Board has denied the appellant's claims for service connection for a right eye disability, diabetes mellitus type II, and bilateral shoulder and arm disabilities due to lack of evidence showing an in-service injury or disease.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected right eye aphakia warrants a disability rating of 30 percent, which is the minimum rating for blindness in one eye. The veteran also meets the criteria for SMC based on loss of use of his right eye.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.