The veteran's service-connected schizophrenic reaction, paranoid type warrants a 70 percent rating and is found to render him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation.
The deciding factor: The evidence shows that the veteran's schizophrenia primarily manifests as chronic worrying and concentration problems with memory deficits induced by worrying and problematic concentration, impacting his social functioning and employment.
- Claimed conditions
- schizophrenic reaction, paranoid type
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 70%
- Decision date
- January 6, 2006
- Citation
- 0600284
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,613 · Granted: 30% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0600284.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's pension claim for survivor's benefits was denied due to the appellant's income exceeding the maximum annual pension rate (MAPR).,Accrued benefits were also denied as there was no pending claim at the time of the Veteran's death.,DIC and compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 are remanded for further action.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for an increased rating for his service-connected schizophrenic reaction, paranoid type and for service connection for a heart condition are being remanded due to the need for additional medical examinations and verification of in-service exposure.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for SMC based on aid and attendance/housebound, finding that there was no factual evidence to support a need for regular aid and attendance prior to December 3, 2012.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities alone do not render him in need of regular aid and attendance or housebound due to his service-connected conditions. The Board finds that the criteria for SMC based on aid and attendance or by virtue of being housebound have not been met.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.