The Board found that the veteran's urinary incontinence and vaginal discharge did not result from VA treatment, and thus denied her claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.
The deciding factor: The preponderance of evidence showed that the veteran's urinary incontinence and vaginal discharge were not caused by any VA treatment, including procedures performed in 1994 and 1998.
- Claimed conditions
- Urinary Incontinence, Vaginal Discharge
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 6, 2006
- Citation
- 0600386
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for an earlier effective date, a higher rating for urinary incontinence, and a higher rating for lumbar spine disability.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence, and granted an initial 10 percent rating for right lower extremity radiculopathy from December 1, 2007, through February 11, 2020.
- Partly granted
The Veteran was granted special monthly compensation based on aid and attendance but denied for housebound status.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for urinary incontinence and rectal dysfunction, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating under applicable criteria.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.