The Board found no evidence linking the veteran's clear cell carcinoma of the right kidney, metastatic to the left adrenal gland, to herbicide exposure during service. The preponderance of the evidence is against a nexus between any current diagnoses and service connection.
The deciding factor: There was no medical opinion linking the veteran's condition to his presumed herbicide exposure in Vietnam.
- Claimed conditions
- clear cell carcinoma of the right kidney, status post left adrenalectomy, status post splenectomy
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 6, 2006
- Citation
- 0600408
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,515 · Granted: 20% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0600408.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's claims for service connection for sickle beta-thalassemia, status post splenectomy, and status post cholecystectomy were granted. The effective dates are set at the date of receipt of her application to reopen (August 25, 2009 for sickle beta-thalassemia, August 10, 2010 for status post splenectomy, and August 10, 2010 for status post cholecystectomy).
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's claims for service connection for his right kidney cancer, spleen and adrenal gland conditions are being remanded due to the need for a VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a significant change in the law brought about by the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, and because the Under Secretary for Benefits needs to review whether the veteran's kidney cancer resulted from exposure to radiation. The Dependents' Educational Assistance claim is also being remanded as it is intertwined with the service connection issue.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's headaches are at least as likely as not caused by his service-connected traumatic brain injury, and thus grants service connection for this condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.