The Board denied the appellant's attempt to reopen her claim for service connection for the cause of death of her husband, finding that no new and material evidence was submitted.
The deciding factor: The appellant did not submit any new and relevant evidence that could substantiate the claim for service connection for the cause of death.
- Claimed conditions
- Cause of Death
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 9, 2006
- Citation
- 0600714
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The appeal was dismissed due to the death of the appellant, rendering it moot.
- Denied
The claim for an earlier effective date for the grant of service connection for the cause of death was denied as no formal or informal claim for service connection for cause of death was received within one year of the Veteran's death in November 2001.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for service connection for sarcoidosis as new and relevant evidence has been received since the previous denial.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for service connection for tinnitus to correct a duty to assist error, as the Veteran's lay statements regarding onset and continuity of symptoms were not adequately considered in the previous decision.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.