The Board found that the veteran's kidney cancer may not be presumed to have been incurred in service due to lack of evidence showing direct causation. The eye disability claim is remanded for further examination and opinion.
The deciding factor: There was insufficient evidence linking the current eye condition to service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Claimed conditions
- cancer of the kidney, eye disability
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 12, 2006
- Citation
- 0600929
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for an eye disability, as there was no evidence of a current disability related to symptoms of blurriness and watery eyes during the appeal period.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for an eye disability and an initial rating in excess of 50 percent for migraines due to insufficient evidence.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for an eye disability for a VA examination and medical opinion to determine if it is related to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for an eye disability and a kidney disability, as the evidence did not support a causal relationship between these conditions and the Veteran's active service.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.