The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to insufficient evidence regarding the service connection of impotence, which may be related to herbicide exposure in service.
The deciding factor: The nature and etiology of the veteran's impotence remain unclear, necessitating further examination and evaluation.
- Claimed conditions
- impotence
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 23, 2006
- Citation
- 0601912
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,547 · Granted: 20% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0601912.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to new evidence received, and a VA examination is needed to determine if the Veteran's erectile dysfunction with impotence is related to his service or any service-connected conditions.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for tinnitus and denied service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder (to include depression) and impotence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection have been remanded due to errors in notification letters.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims of trench mouth, impotence, COPD, and emphysema for further development due to duty-to-assist errors.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.